Nearly half of Canadian hospitals failed to report serious adverse drug reactions despite mandatory reporting laws, raising concerns about the quality of data used by Health Canada to assess drug safety. The analysis revealed significant discrepancies in reporting, with some hospitals reporting no incidents and others reporting over 1,000. Experts suggest that inconsistent reporting may be due to a lack of clear guidelines and insufficient training. The article highlights the importance of accurate data for drug safety and the potential need for stricter enforcement of reporting requirements.

Health Canada has not consistently tracked the sex of patients in adverse medical device incidents despite a commitment to do so, with sex data missing in 95% of cases between February 2020 and July 2021. Experts argue that tracking sex is crucial for understanding device failures and their impact on different groups. The Scientific Advisory Committee on Health Products for Women is urging Health Canada to make sex data collection mandatory. The article highlights the broader issue of gender bias in medical research and device approval processes.

Montreal's balcony culture, known as 'balconville,' is a cherished aspect of the city's urban life, offering a unique communal experience. Originating in the 1860s, balconies have served as essential outdoor spaces for city dwellers. The term 'balconville' was popularized in the late 1970s and has been reclaimed by Montrealers who enjoy their summers on balconies. The culture fosters community connections and provides a canvas for everyday rituals, from sunbathing to hosting dinners. Residents like Wayne Robinson and Claudia Lavallée highlight the inclusive and magical aspects of this tradition.

Health Canada is set to propose regulations requiring drug trial sponsors to provide data disaggregated by sex, age, and race to better protect under-represented groups from ineffective treatments and adverse side effects. This initiative aims to address historical gaps in clinical trial data that have left women, racialized populations, and the elderly at risk. The federal government has already launched a questionnaire for new drug submissions to establish a baseline for data collection. Experts view this as a positive step, though some caution that the regulation's impact may be limited by its reliance on data already submitted to other international agencies. The proposed regulation is expected to be published for public consultation by the end of December 2022, with potential implementation in the first half of 2023.

The Liberal Party's 2021 campaign promise to revoke charity status for anti-abortion organizations that provide misleading counseling remains unfulfilled ten months after re-election. Despite internal discussions among Canadian government agencies, no clear plan or timeline has been provided, frustrating both supporters and opponents. The Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada and Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights advocate for swift action, while Conservative MPs and Imagine Canada criticize the move as politicizing the charitable sector. The government's silence and redacted documents obtained through an Access to Information request add to the uncertainty surrounding the promise's implementation.

Anishinaabe and Dakota chiefs in Manitoba, represented by the Southern Chiefs’ Organization, are calling for an inquiry into the federal government's review process for major infrastructure projects on First Nations. They argue that federal policies force them to work with sub-standard firms, leading to poor project outcomes and systemic neglect. The call follows an investigation by Global News and partners, which found that outdated federal policies hinder safe drinking water on reserves. Indigenous Services Minister Marc Miller disputes these claims, stating that procurement processes aim for value for money. Chiefs emphasize the need for First Nations control over projects to ensure better outcomes.

The federal government's $1.7 billion investment in new infrastructure for First Nations communities has not adequately accounted for climate change, leading to vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure like water treatment plants. Experts argue that climate change considerations should be mandatory in project designs to ensure long-term resilience. While Infrastructure Canada has implemented such requirements for municipal and provincial projects, Indigenous Services Canada has not, citing respect for First Nations' autonomy. Critics, including NDP MP Charlie Angus, argue that this approach is a cost-saving measure that ultimately places First Nations at risk. The article highlights the need for policy changes to incorporate climate resilience in all infrastructure projects, regardless of size.

The parliamentary budget office estimates that compensating First Nations families and children affected by the child welfare system and delays in essential services could cost the federal government up to $15 billion. This figure includes thousands more children, parents, and grandparents eligible for $40,000 payments under recent developments. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal ordered the government to compensate those denied services or faced delays. NDP MP Charlie Angus criticized the government's refusal to negotiate, which he claims has increased costs. The report underscores the significant financial and social implications of the tribunal's rulings and the government's response.

The Trudeau government faces scrutiny over its procurement policies for First Nations infrastructure projects, with allegations against Kingdom Construction Ltd. for overcharges, deficient work, delays, and racism. First Nations leaders express frustration over limited autonomy in contractor selection. Indigenous Services Canada has agreed to investigate but has not yet initiated the process. The article highlights the need for better government support and information collection to aid First Nations in contractor selection.

The article investigates the water crisis affecting First Nations communities in Canada, highlighting the lack of government data on water-related illnesses. Experts and critics argue that this data gap hinders effective policy-making and accountability. The federal government faces lawsuits over inadequate water access, while community leaders and residents report health issues linked to contaminated water. The article underscores the systemic neglect and calls for urgent action to address the water crisis and its health impacts on Indigenous communities.