New Hampshire's business tax cuts, initiated in 2015, have led to a significant increase in business tax revenues, doubling from $561.7 million to $1.2 billion. The share of state revenues paid by businesses has risen, while the share from property taxpayers has decreased by more than half. Despite predictions that tax cuts would reduce business contributions, businesses now account for a larger portion of state revenues. The increase is attributed to a booming economy and rising business profits, with more businesses registering and paying taxes. Smaller tax changes, such as the elimination of the Electricity Consumption Tax and adjustments to the Rooms & Meals Tax, have not significantly impacted this shift.

The article critiques the notion that freedom equates to having nothing left to lose, arguing instead that freedom is foundational to prosperity. It highlights the historical shift from poverty and subjugation to economic growth driven by democratic and inclusive institutions. The text emphasizes the importance of free markets and limited government in fostering innovation, growth, and individual autonomy. It warns against the dangers of insider collusion and restrictive policies that hinder economic progress. The Josiah Bartlett Center for Public Policy is cited as advocating for policies that expand economic freedom, underscoring New Hampshire's success in economic freedom and low poverty rates.

The article argues against the feasibility of raising taxes solely on the wealthy in New Hampshire due to the state's constitutional requirement for proportional taxation. It highlights that New Hampshire's tax system, including business and income taxes, is flat, meaning all payers are taxed at the same rate. The piece critiques progressive claims that recent tax cuts favored large corporations and the wealthy, emphasizing that these cuts applied equally to all taxpayers. It suggests that any proposal to tax only the rich would require either a new progressive tax system or constitutional amendments, urging voters and reporters to scrutinize such proposals.

The article debunks five myths surrounding New Hampshire's business tax cuts from 2015 to 2022, using state financial data to refute claims that the cuts led to reduced state revenues, decreased aid to local governments and public schools, and projected revenue shortfalls. It highlights that business tax revenues have more than doubled, the share of state revenues from businesses has increased, and state aid to local governments and public schools has risen. The article argues that increased state spending, not revenue declines, is responsible for any projected shortfalls.

State aid to New Hampshire municipalities and public school districts increased by $214 million from 2015 to 2025, contrary to claims that business tax cuts reduced local aid. The increase is funded by state tax revenue, not federal COVID relief. Education grants rose by 15%, with a 26% increase in per-pupil expenditure, despite a 9% drop in enrollment. Inflation has impacted the value of these increases, but the narrative that state aid was cut due to tax cuts is false, as business tax revenues have more than doubled since 2015.

New England governors, along with the premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, are advocating for decarbonizing the region's electrical generation by building offshore wind farms. However, the article criticizes this approach, highlighting the lack of cost projections and reliability concerns. ISO New England, the region's power grid operator, suggests that nuclear or synthetic natural gas generation would be more reliable and cost-effective. The article argues against the 'family' approach to governance, emphasizing individual sovereignty and critiquing the governors' energy policies.

The article discusses the impact of Massachusetts' high tax rates on interstate migration, highlighting a trend of residents moving to lower-tax states like New Hampshire, Florida, and Texas. It references data from the U.S. Census Bureau and the Tax Foundation, showing a pattern of population shifts from high-tax to low-tax states. The piece argues that while Massachusetts' millionaires tax has increased state revenue, it may drive wealthy individuals to relocate, potentially harming the state's long-term economic health. The article suggests that a competitive tax policy could benefit the entire New England region.

The article discusses the impact of Massachusetts' high tax rates on the migration of wealthy residents to lower-tax states like New Hampshire, Florida, and Texas. It highlights a trend of Americans moving from high-tax to lower-tax states, supported by data from the Tax Foundation and U.S. Census Bureau. The piece argues that while Massachusetts' millionaires tax has increased state revenue, it may ultimately harm the state's economy and neighboring New Hampshire if it slows economic growth. The article suggests that a competitive tax policy would benefit all of New England.

The Steeplegate Mall in Concord is set for demolition, with plans to replace it with mixed-use developments including residential areas and a Costco. The article argues that the city's foresight in rezoning the area has facilitated this transformation, contrasting it with other New Hampshire locations where restrictive regulations hinder development. It advocates for reducing government restrictions to allow for more innovative and market-driven urban development.