The article discusses the transition from Moon Jae-in's presidency to Yoon Suk-yeol's in South Korea, highlighting the stagnant inter-Korean relations and the challenges posed by North Korea's missile tests and nuclear threats. It covers the conservative Yoon's lack of political experience and his firm stance against North Korea, contrasting with Moon's more conciliatory approach. The article also touches on the potential impact of Russia's invasion of Ukraine on the Korean Peninsula and the implications of Yoon's inauguration speech, which offered dialogue and economic incentives to North Korea for denuclearization. Additionally, it mentions the outbreak of COVID-19 in North Korea and the South's offer of vaccine aid.

The last third of 2023 saw significant events on the Korean Peninsula, with South Korea reacting to North Korea's successful military reconnaissance satellite launch by partially suspending the 2018 inter-Korean military accord. This led North Korea to scrap the accord entirely, escalating tensions as both sides rearmed at the Demilitarized Zone. Kim Jong Un's summit with Vladimir Putin and the subsequent military cooperation between North Korea and Russia raised concerns in Seoul. The article also discusses the implications of Hamas' attack on Israel and the potential parallels for South Korea. The year ended with Kim Jong Un declaring a major shift in North Korea's doctrine, viewing the peninsula as relations between two belligerent states.

Kim Jong-un has vowed that North Korea will continue to stockpile nuclear weapons and has threatened the US with 'final doom.' The latest missile test has escalated tensions, with North Korea's state media asserting the need for nuclear deterrence. The UN Security Council, including China and Russia, condemned the missile launch, while US President Donald Trump and South Korean President Moon Jae-in have both issued strong responses. Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and UK Prime Minister Theresa May have also condemned North Korea's actions, with May discussing the crisis during her trade mission to Japan. The situation has raised fears of a potential conflict, with North Korea's missile tests seen as a direct threat to regional stability.

In mid-2023, tensions between North and South Korea escalated further, with North Korea's nuclear threats intensifying in response to US-ROK military exercises and the visit of a US nuclear-armed submarine. South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol institutionalized a hardline stance by repurposing the Ministry of Unification to focus on exposing North Korea's human rights abuses rather than fostering cooperation. North Korea's attempts to launch military reconnaissance satellites failed, while its missile program showed significant advancements. The article also discusses the replacement of South Korea's Unification Minister and the implications of these changes for inter-Korean relations, highlighting the increasingly hostile rhetoric and actions from both sides.

Inter-Korean relations in late 2022 were marked by escalating provocations from North Korea, including missile launches, artillery volleys, and drone incursions. Kim Jong Un intensified nuclear threats, emphasizing tactical nuclear weapons. South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol reinstated North Korea as an enemy and considered retaliatory measures, including scrapping a 2018 military accord. The period saw heightened tensions, with North Korea's provocations putting pressure on South Korea, which struggled to respond effectively. The new year is expected to bring continued anxiety and potential for conflict on the Korean peninsula.

Korea's leaders presented contrasting New Year addresses, with Moon Jae-in focusing on peace efforts and Kim Jong Un remaining silent on South Korea and the US while testing hypersonic missiles. Moon's persistent push for a peace declaration faces skepticism from both Washington and Pyongyang. As Moon's term ends, his successor's approach to inter-Korean relations remains uncertain, with the liberal candidate Lee Jae-myung leading the polls. The article evaluates Moon's 'nordpolitik,' highlighting the challenges and limited progress in inter-Korean relations, and discusses the broader geopolitical implications involving the US and China.

Aidan Foster-Carter critiques South Korean President Moon Jae-in's approach to diplomacy with North Korea, describing it as one-sided and ineffective. The article highlights a Japanese diplomat's vulgar metaphor to emphasize the awkwardness and challenges faced by South Korea in its diplomatic efforts.

The article delves into North Korea's cement industry, highlighting its historical and current state. It emphasizes the significant role of foreign involvement in establishing and maintaining the industry, contradicting the self-reliance narrative. Key facilities like the Sunghori Cement Factory and the Sangwon Cement Complex are discussed, noting their foreign origins and ownership changes. The article also points to potential areas for further research, including foreign companies' involvement and historical records. Despite challenges, North Korea's cement industry continues to operate, with fluctuating output and quality issues.

North Korea has made significant reforestation efforts in urban and tourist areas like Pyongyang, the Kaesong Industrial Complex, and the Mt. Kumgang International Tourism Zone, while rural and mountainous regions continue to suffer from deforestation. The reforestation is part of a broader environmental beautification initiative, possibly aimed at high-ranking officials and foreign tourists. However, these efforts have led to tensions with rural residents who lose arable land for farming. To sustain reforestation, North Korea needs to address food and energy supply issues for rural communities to prevent further reclamation of land for private use or fuel.

Inter-Korean relations remain strained with little progress, as North Korea continues to ignore or insult South Korea's efforts for engagement. The Moon Jae-in administration faces criticism for its handling of North Korea, including a controversial nuclear power plant plan and a propaganda balloon ban. Military tensions persist, with both Koreas enhancing their arsenals. Human rights issues in North Korea are downplayed by the South Korean government, leading to domestic and international criticism. Despite these challenges, Moon's government remains committed to engagement, though time is running out as his term nears its end.

South Korean foreign minister Chung Eui-yong recently expressed strong criticism towards North Korea. The article, written by Aidan Foster-Carter, explores the growing impatience of South Korea with its northern neighbor, analyzing the political dynamics and implications of this shift in tone.

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's new economic strategy aims to increase self-sufficiency, consolidate control over the economy, and reconfigure the state's relationship with private entrepreneurs. However, these objectives may conflict, especially given the country's fiscal constraints exacerbated by international sanctions. The strategy includes ambitious investment plans and tighter control over private sector activities, particularly targeting the donju, or 'money masters.' Historical cycles of liberalization and retrenchment in North Korea's economy highlight the challenges of balancing central control with market mechanisms. The article questions the feasibility of achieving these goals simultaneously, suggesting potential stagnation for the North Korean economy.

Kim Jong Un's report to the Korean Workers’ Party Congress emphasizes restoring state control over the North Korean economy and society. The report signals a potential rollback of semi-private economic activities and increased repression of foreign cultural influences. Kim's tenure has seen intensified crackdowns on smuggling and consumption of South Korean media, reflecting his broader agenda of social control. Despite early economic liberalization experiments, the state has consistently aimed to formalize and oversee private economic activities. The measures risk exacerbating economic difficulties for the civilian population dependent on market trade and private business.

Inter-Korean relations have deteriorated, marked by a tragic incident where a South Korean official was killed in North Korean waters. Despite apologies from North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, the incident has cast doubt on the sincerity of North Korea's commitment to peace. South Korea's President Moon Jae-in remains optimistic, but the reality of the situation suggests a bleak outlook for renewed dialogue. North Korea continues to reject South Korean overtures for cooperation, and the recent ban on propaganda balloon launches across the DMZ by South Korea's ruling party has not improved relations. The Eighth Congress of the Workers' Party of Korea reaffirmed a hardline stance, with Kim Jong Un blaming South Korea for the stalled relations and demanding the South to control anti-reunification activities. The article suggests that prospects for inter-Korean relations in 2021 are not hopeful.

The idea of South Korea acting as a mediator between the US and North Korea is criticized as fundamentally flawed. With Joe Biden in office, the dynamics of US-South Korea relations and their approach to North Korea are expected to change. The author, Aidan Foster-Carter, argues against South Korea taking on this intermediary role.

India and South Korea are strengthening their bilateral relationship through increased trade, economic cooperation, and defense collaboration. Despite challenges such as India's ties with North Korea and South Korea's economic relations with China, both countries are finding common ground in regional security, digital innovation, and sustainable development. Key initiatives include South Korea's 'K-New Deal' and India's 'Digital India' and 'Smart Cities Mission.' The partnership is also bolstered by their involvement in the 'Quad Plus' and potential collaboration in the Indo-Pacific region. Significant business investments and defense agreements further solidify their strategic alignment.

Events on the Korean peninsula have rapidly evolved, with significant inter-Korean developments. The article responds to Lynn Turk's commentary on a previous piece about Thae Yong-ho and Lee In-young, emphasizing the importance of academic freedom and debate. It critiques the South Korean government's sensitivity to criticism and questions the political beliefs and actions of key figures like Lee In-young and Moon Jae-in. The article highlights the enduring relevance of ideological debates from the 1980s and their impact on current inter-Korean relations, questioning the effectiveness of Moon's peace process and the motivations behind political decisions.

Relations between North and South Korea deteriorated significantly over the summer, marked by North Korea's aggressive actions, including the destruction of the joint liaison office in Kaesong. Despite South Korea's attempts to engage and offer aid, North Korea remained uncooperative, citing COVID-19 concerns. The period also saw internal political shifts in South Korea, with new appointments in key security positions. The article highlights the ongoing challenges in inter-Korean relations, exacerbated by natural disasters and the global pandemic, and questions the effectiveness of South Korea's engagement strategy.

The article discusses the potential inclusion of South Korea in the Five Eyes (FVEY) intelligence-sharing alliance, which currently includes the US, UK, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. This expansion aims to monitor activities in North Korea and China. South Korea's participation could enhance its intelligence capabilities and strengthen ties with democratic powers, but it faces challenges such as potential Chinese retaliation and ongoing tensions with Japan. The article highlights the strategic benefits and geopolitical implications of South Korea joining the FVEY Plus framework.

The article provides an American diplomat's perspective on the political dynamics between Thae Yong-ho and Lee In-young in South Korea. It argues that the public in South Korea is largely indifferent to the controversy, viewing Lee as a well-vetted politician. Thae's actions are seen as a strategic move to fill a leadership vacuum within the conservative party. The article also reflects on the historical context of student movements in South Korea and their stance on unification and democracy, contrasting it with the ideology of Juche. The influence of Catholicism on progressive politics in South Korea is also highlighted.

The article details a heated exchange in South Korea's National Assembly between Lee In-young, the newly appointed minister of unification, and Thae Yong-ho, a former North Korean diplomat turned South Korean lawmaker. Thae questioned Lee's past ideological leanings towards North Korea's Juche ideology, which Lee deflected by emphasizing South Korea's democratic values. The article explores the historical context of ideological persecution in South Korea and the implications of pro-North sentiments within the current political landscape. It highlights the ideological divide and the political maneuvering within South Korea's ruling Democratic Party and the opposition United Future Party.

Inter-Korean relations remained stagnant in early 2020, with North Korea's lack of response to South Korea's outreach and refusal to cooperate on COVID-19. South Korea's President Moon Jae-in's party won a significant victory in parliamentary elections, while North Korea resumed missile tests. Kim Jong Un's temporary disappearance caused global speculation. The article discusses the implications of these events within the broader context of bilateral relationships in the Indo-Pacific and the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

North Korea claims to have no COVID-19 cases, a stance likely driven by political motivations to manage domestic anxiety and assert authority. Despite early and strict measures, the country's close ties with China raise doubts about this claim. Reports suggest possible COVID-19 cases and deaths, which North Korea has not acknowledged. The regime's strategy may include seeking medical assistance while maintaining secrecy and self-reliance. Diplomatic gestures towards South Korea and the US indicate potential future requests for aid. The deteriorating health care system and economic challenges underscore the need for transparency and external support.

The health status of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has raised global concerns due to his recent absence from public view and unconfirmed reports of cardiac surgery. Kim's lifestyle factors, including heavy smoking, obesity, and a family history of cardiovascular disease, significantly increase his health risks. Utilizing NASA's Astro-CHARM tool, hypothetical risk assessments suggest that Kim's cardiovascular risk could be mitigated with lifestyle changes and medical treatment. The article underscores the potential security implications of Kim's health for the Korean Peninsula.

Three years ago, Kim Jong Nam was assassinated in Malaysia using VX nerve agent, allegedly orchestrated by North Korea. The incident highlighted North Korea's capabilities and moral disregard. Despite international outrage, North Korea faced minimal consequences. The article criticizes the responses of global leaders, particularly Donald Trump and Moon Jae-in, for their perceived naivety in dealing with Kim Jong Un. It underscores the ongoing threat posed by North Korea's WMD programs and cybercrime activities, urging a clear-eyed approach to negotiations.

2019 saw a significant deterioration in inter-Korean relations, with North Korea rejecting South Korean overtures and continuing weapons tests. Despite setbacks, South Korean President Moon Jae-in remains optimistic about future cooperation. Key issues include North Korea's refusal to cooperate on swine fever, the controversial repatriation of North Korean defectors by South Korea, and the strained inter-Korean sporting events. Kim Jong Un's stance has shifted towards a more isolationist and self-reliant approach, further complicating diplomatic efforts. The article highlights the challenges and complexities in the relationship between the two Koreas, with little hope for improvement in 2020.

The article examines the history and current state of the North Korea peace process, highlighting the longstanding nature of the nuclear crisis and the frequent shifts between diplomatic engagement and military tension. It underscores the challenges posed by regime changes in the U.S. and South Korea, the ideological divides in policy approaches, and the cunning of the Kim regime. The piece concludes that despite various efforts, no approach has succeeded in denuclearizing North Korea.

Kim Jong Un's New Year’s Address is anticipated to signal a significant shift in North Korea's foreign policy, potentially suspending denuclearization talks with the US and pivoting towards stronger ties with Beijing and Moscow. The article reviews the contrasting tones of Kim's 2018 and 2019 addresses, highlighting the missed opportunities and deteriorating relations following the failed Hanoi Summit and subsequent US-ROK military activities. The North Korean leader's demands for an end to joint military exercises and a peace treaty remain unmet, casting doubt on future negotiations and the denuclearization process.

In 2019, Russia maintained friendly ties with North Korea, closely coordinating with China and following Beijing's lead on Korean Peninsula issues. The Kim-Putin summit in Vladivostok was polite but lacked substantive agreements. Economic links between Russia and North Korea remained limited due to UN sanctions and North Korea's lack of cash. Russian companies are deterred by US sanctions, and the Khasan-Rajin rail-and-port venture has failed to attract major customers. Russia complied with the UN ban on North Korean labor, and relations were tested by North Korean illegal fishing in Russian waters. Russia's goals with North Korea align with China's, and the two countries have acted in lockstep on Korean affairs. The coming year is likely to be turbulent, with potential escalatory moves by North Korea and coordinated responses from China and Russia.

The article critiques the prevailing narratives around North Korea's diplomatic engagements from 2017 to 2019, arguing that Kim Jong-un has consistently outmaneuvered the US and South Korea. It highlights the shift from aggressive posturing in 2017 to unproductive summits in 2018, and finally to resumed missile tests and taunts in 2019. The author contends that the US and South Korea's strategies have been ineffective, with North Korea strengthening its position, particularly through improved relations with China. The piece is critical of the optimistic rhetoric from the US and South Korea, suggesting it is delusional given the lack of substantive progress.

North Korea has continued to distance itself from South Korea, ignoring Seoul's diplomatic efforts and reverting to missile tests. Despite this, South Korean President Moon Jae-in remains publicly optimistic. The departure of John Bolton from the White House may offer a chance for improved relations if the US offers sanctions relief. However, inter-Korean relations are currently secondary to US-DPRK ties. The article also discusses the lack of progress in sports cooperation for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics and the negative response from North Korea to South Korea's diplomatic overtures and military exercises. The tone of North Korean statements towards South Korea has become increasingly contemptuous.

The article discusses South Korean President Moon Jae-in's optimistic view that economic cooperation between South Korea (ROK) and North Korea (DPRK) could help South Korea catch up with Japan economically. It highlights the potential economic benefits of inter-Korean cooperation and reflects on the broader implications of such a strategy.

The article discusses the ongoing trade conflict between South Korea and Japan, highlighting the surprise nature of Japan's actions. It is the second part of a series by Aidan Foster-Carter.

Japan and South Korea are currently experiencing significant tensions, which could potentially benefit North Korea. The article is part of a series analyzing the ongoing trade dispute between the two nations.

On this day in 2018, the first-ever summit between serving leaders of the United States and North Korea took place in Singapore, where Donald Trump met Kim Jong Un. The host nation, Singapore, spent $12 million on security and accommodations for Kim Jong Un.

The inter-Korean peace process that showed promise in 2018 has stalled in 2019, with North Korea severing almost all contacts with South Korea following the failed Kim-Trump summit in Hanoi. Kim Jong Un's missile launches in early May further strained relations, despite South Korean President Moon Jae-in's efforts to maintain dialogue. The article highlights the decline in inter-Korean cooperation across various sectors, including high-level talks, sports exchanges, and family reunions. Kim's dismissive attitude towards South Korea's mediation efforts and the resumption of missile testing have undermined Moon's peacemaking initiatives, leaving the future of North-South relations uncertain.

South Korea and North Korea have agreed to cooperate on combating malaria, with a significant agreement signed in September 2018. Despite past suspensions of funds and efforts, the new initiative aims to exchange health information through a liaison office in Kaesong. Malaria cases have surged in both countries, particularly along the DMZ, due to various factors including insufficient antimalarial efforts and environmental conditions. The article emphasizes the importance of cross-border cooperation and improved surveillance systems to effectively address the malaria epidemic on the Korean Peninsula.

The article discusses the stalled progress in inter-Korean relations following the Panmunjom Summit and the challenges faced by South Korean President Moon Jae-in. It critiques North Korea's hard-line stance and the lack of reciprocity in diplomatic efforts. The author argues for a long-term, bipartisan approach to handling North Korea, emphasizing the need for consistency and continuity in South Korean policy. The article also calls for South Korea to assertively address North Korea's actions and rhetoric, advocating for a more balanced and respectful relationship.

A South Korean journalist based in Japan, Cho Yun-yong, obtained a rare official document from North Korea, which is typically kept secret. The article criticizes North Korea's economic strategy, describing it as delusional and highlighting the secrecy surrounding its economic policies.

Following Kim Jong Un's April 12 address to the Supreme People’s Assembly, North Korean media has increased criticism of South Korea, shifting blame from the South Korean military to the authorities. This change indicates a deterioration in inter-Korean dialogue. Despite harsher rhetoric, North Korea has not declared relations with the South as irreparable, suggesting a willingness to keep dialogue open. Pyongyang's complaints center on the belief that reduced military exercises by the US and South Korea are attempts to circumvent agreements, including the US-DPRK Singapore statement.

On the anniversary of the first North-South summit between Kim Jong Un and Moon Jae-in, North Korea's decision to cold-shoulder South Korea is criticized as unfair and unwise. The article reflects on the high hopes raised by the initial meetings and the implications of the current diplomatic stance.

Aidan Foster-Carter is an honorary senior research fellow in Sociology and Modern Korea at Leeds University. He is also a freelance writer, consultant, and broadcaster who specializes in topics related to both North and South Korea. His work encompasses a range of activities including academic research, writing articles, providing consultancy services, and participating in broadcast discussions, all focused on the sociological aspects and modern developments of the Korean peninsula.

Aidan Foster-Carter is an honorary senior research fellow in Sociology and Modern Korea at Leeds University. He is also a freelance writer, consultant, and broadcaster who specializes in topics related to both North and South Korea. His work encompasses a range of activities including academic research, writing articles, providing consultancy services, and participating in broadcast discussions, all focused on the sociological aspects and modern developments of the Korean peninsula.

Recent claims that Kim Jong Un has taken on a new title as 'the supreme representative of all the Korean people' have sparked speculation that he is asserting leadership over the entire Korean Peninsula. However, this interpretation may be a misunderstanding. The phrase likely relates to North Korea's internal politics, signifying Kim's status within the DPRK's electoral system rather than hegemonic ambitions over South Korea. The article suggests that the choice of words is more about avoiding the oddity of the Supreme Leader representing a single constituency and less about an open challenge to South Korean President Moon Jae-in.

Kim Jong Un is preparing for his first summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, focusing on economic projects and North Korea's negotiating strategy. Russia seeks recognition as a key player in Korean affairs and aims to secure North Korean commitments to support its economic initiatives, such as the Trans-Siberian and Trans-Korean railway and gas pipeline. Both countries are likely to discuss ways to mitigate the impact of US and international sanctions on North Korea. The summit underscores Russia's desire to maintain a significant role in Northeast Asian security and diplomacy.

Kim Jong Un's New Year's address focused positively on DPRK-US relations, highlighting his commitment to negotiations with the US and expressing optimism for progress. He left open the possibility of a 'new way' to defend North Korea's sovereignty if the US continues sanctions and pressure. Kim did not mention the 'phase-by-phase' approach to denuclearization, instead suggesting faster progress if the US reciprocates North Korea's efforts. He affirmed his 'firm will' for complete denuclearization, though the term 'Korean Peninsula' was not directly linked to denuclearization in all English versions of his speech. Kim also emphasized the shift from the 'byungjin' policy to focusing on economic construction and subtly referenced economic reforms without overt mention.

Kim Jong Un's 2019 New Year’s address emphasized North Korea's achievements in 2018 as irreversible and hinted at a strategic shift towards China if the US remains uncooperative. The speech, delivered in a state-of-the-union style, highlighted Kim's confidence bolstered by recent summits with China, South Korea, and Singapore. The address suggested that North Korea might seek new ways to ensure its sovereignty and stability, potentially leveraging its relationship with China against the US. The article analyzes the implications of this strategic positioning and the potential responses from China and the US.

Inter-Korean relations saw significant developments in 2018, marked by three summits and substantial agreements between North and South Korea. Despite symbolic progress, actual economic cooperation remains hindered by UN and US sanctions. The article highlights the importance of confidence-building measures, the challenges posed by ongoing cyber-attacks, and the cautious optimism for continued progress in 2019. Key figures include Kim Jong Un and Moon Jae-in, with the US playing a critical role in the sanctions regime. The article underscores the need for genuine commitment from North Korea to sustain the positive momentum.

The article discusses the anticipation surrounding Kim Jong Un's upcoming New Year address, reflecting on the previous year's developments in diplomacy and the potential implications for US-DPRK and inter-Korean relations. It provides context on the tradition of New Year speeches in North Korea, expectations for domestic policy announcements, and the potential for Kim to address international issues, particularly the stances of the US and South Korea. The article also speculates on the tone Kim might adopt and the possible content of his speech, including issues such as denuclearization, sanctions, and human rights.

The article responds to Mr. Katzeff Silberstein's argument that North Korea can afford to meet its humanitarian needs but chooses not to. It acknowledges the logic in his argument but emphasizes that many governments fail to care for their vulnerable populations despite having the resources. The article argues that withholding aid in hopes of changing government behavior is unjust and highlights the plight of North Korea's voiceless, hungry, and medically underserved population. It also points out that even countries with higher per capita GDP receive significant humanitarian aid.

The article explores the metaphorical and literal implications of a recent train derailment in South Korea, drawing parallels to the current state of inter-Korean relations. It highlights the operational failures of Korail and the political blame game between South Korea's ruling Democratic Party and the opposition Liberty Korea Party. The article questions the sustainability of the peace process between North and South Korea, noting a deceleration in progress and the complexities of balancing relations with the United States. It emphasizes the need for bipartisan consensus and the challenges posed by political appointments and sanctions.

Kim Jong Un has been working on a three-stage plan to reshape his international image, often underestimated by the global community. This article is part of a series analyzing the current state of affairs with North Korea, emphasizing Kim's strategic diplomatic efforts.

Kim Jong Un has been significantly underestimated by the world, as recent events have shown. The term 'misunderestimated,' popularized by George W Bush, aptly describes the global misjudgment of Kim Jong Un's capabilities and actions.

Kim Jong Un focused on consolidating power internally by reining in the Korean People's Army, purging rivals, and restoring the Party's pre-eminence during his first four years in power. From 2016, he shifted his attention to securing North Korea's external position through a series of nuclear and ICBM tests, which solidified the country's defenses but escalated global tensions.

The article examines the evolving strategic and diplomatic dynamics on the Korean Peninsula, highlighting the implications for US-ROK military exercises and broader security arrangements. It discusses the confusion surrounding US policy on joint exercises with South Korea, following President Trump's statements and the subsequent reactions from South Korean officials. The piece explores the potential for a new US-ROK-DPRK triangular relationship, emphasizing the need for the US to counter China's influence in Northeast Asia while fostering a cooperative security approach with both Koreas. The analysis underscores the importance of maintaining readiness and deterrence capabilities despite the suspension of large-scale exercises, and advocates for a strategic realignment to empower the Korean nation and reduce regional tensions.

South Korean President Moon Jae-in is set to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong Un for their third summit, aiming to advance the peace process on the Korean Peninsula. Despite the stalled US-DPRK negotiations, Moon seeks to build on the Panmunjom Declaration's achievements, which include various inter-Korean projects and a permanent liaison office. Challenges include the need for bipartisan support in South Korea, the unpredictable stance of the US, and North Korea's trustworthiness. Moon's efforts are seen as crucial for long-term peace, with economic cooperation involving South Korean businesses like Samsung being a positive development.

An authoritative-level article in Rodong Sinmun on September 15 has reasserted North Korea's commitment to a new relationship with the US and the denuclearization process. The article criticizes US conservative politicians and possibly internal opponents, while supporting Kim Jong Un's position on peace and denuclearization. It suggests that despite critical voices, the DPRK-US relationship is progressing on a new historic track, with a positive portrayal of President Trump and an open stance on the timing of an end of war declaration.

Three of Asia’s enduring flashpoints, including the division of Korea, remain unresolved and potentially explosive. However, recent developments on the Korean Peninsula have been unexpectedly positive. Kim Jong Un, who had not engaged in international diplomacy for six years, has dramatically shifted his approach in 2018, culminating in a historic summit with Donald Trump in Singapore. This marks a significant change in North Korea's diplomatic stance, moving away from its 'hermit kingdom' image.

The upcoming historic summit between US President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un will focus on denuclearization, a term with differing interpretations for both parties. While the US demands complete, verifiable, and irreversible disarmament, North Korea envisions a phased process. The article highlights the impracticality of the Libya model for North Korea and the shift in Trump's approach to a more gradual process. The summit aims to initiate a long-term denuclearization effort, though significant challenges remain in aligning both sides' expectations.

The article discusses the recent developments in inter-Korean relations, highlighting the significant progress made through diplomatic efforts, particularly the Panmunjom Declaration. It emphasizes the cautious optimism surrounding the new era of cooperation between North and South Korea, while acknowledging the challenges ahead, especially regarding denuclearization. The article also notes the strategic moves by Kim Jong Un and the diplomatic achievements of Moon Jae-in, with a balanced view on the potential outcomes of the upcoming Kim-Trump summit.

The article discusses the temporary easing of tensions on the Korean Peninsula during the 23rd Winter Olympics in PyeongChang, South Korea. Despite the symbolic unity displayed, such as the joint march of North and South Korean athletes and the presence of North Korean officials and performers, the author, Aidan Foster-Carter, cautions that this is not a sign of lasting peace. He notes that similar gestures have occurred in the past without leading to significant change. The article emphasizes that the underlying issues, particularly North Korea's weapons program, remain unresolved and that the resumption of US-South Korea military exercises after the Olympics could reignite tensions.

The article discusses the temporary pause in tensions on the Korean Peninsula during the 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang, South Korea, where North and South Korean athletes marched together under a unified flag. Despite this symbolic gesture, the article emphasizes that the underlying crisis, particularly North Korea's nuclear threats, remains unresolved. The piece highlights the historical context of inter-Korean cooperation and the anticipated resumption of US-South Korea military exercises, which North Korea views as provocative. The author, Aidan Foster-Carter, provides a cautious perspective on the fleeting nature of this Olympic-induced peace.

Recent reports have highlighted the strained relations between North Korea and Australia, with mixed messages from Pyongyang. On September 24, North Korea's Supreme People's Assembly sent an open letter to various parliaments, raising concerns about potential threats to Canberra and Sydney. The article examines the implications of these developments on DPRK-Australia relations.

Donald Trump has ruled out negotiations with North Korea following a missile test, accusing the US of paying 'extortion money' for decades. Kim Jong-un's regime continues to escalate tensions with missile launches, prompting strong condemnations from the UN Security Council, including China and Russia. South Korea and Japan have responded with military actions and heightened alerts. The international community, including leaders like Theresa May and Shinzo Abe, are discussing further measures to address the threat posed by North Korea's actions.

Kim Jong-un is portrayed as a strategic leader rather than a reckless villain, with his actions aimed at self-defense and political maneuvering. The article criticizes Donald Trump's responses and emphasizes the importance of diplomacy over military action. It highlights the geopolitical complexities involving North Korea, the US, China, and Japan, and suggests that recognizing North Korea as a nuclear power may be an unpalatable but necessary step.

South Korea has made remarkable progress since its liberation in 1945, transforming from a war-torn and impoverished nation into an economic powerhouse and a robust democracy. Despite facing constant threats from North Korea, South Korea has achieved significant advancements in economics, politics, social welfare, and culture. The article highlights the country's journey and accomplishments, urging a balanced assessment of its progress compared to other nations.

Kim Jong-nam, the half-brother of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, was assassinated at Kuala Lumpur airport, with initial reports suggesting a poison-laced cloth was used. The article explores potential motives and suspects, primarily pointing to the North Korean regime and Kim Jong-un's possible involvement due to family dynamics and political threats. Historical references to other North Korean assassinations and purges are provided, along with speculation about China's role and the timing of the assassination. The piece concludes with the notion that Kim Jong-nam's death removes a potential threat to Kim Jong-un's rule.

Kim Jong-nam, the eldest son of Kim Jong-il and half-brother of Kim Jong-un, was assassinated at Kuala Lumpur airport. The article explores various theories and motives behind the assassination, primarily suspecting the North Korean regime and Kim Jong-un. It delves into Kim Jong-nam's background, his strained relationship with his half-brother, and the potential involvement of state power in his murder. The piece also considers the role of Chinese protection and the possibility of internal North Korean factions acting independently to gain favor with Kim Jong-un.

South Korea's national assembly voted overwhelmingly to impeach President Park Geun-hye due to a scandal involving her close friend Choi Soon-sil, who allegedly manipulated presidential decisions and extorted donations from major corporations like Hyundai and Samsung. The impeachment reflects public sentiment, with Park's approval rating plummeting to 4% and millions protesting for her resignation. The constitutional court will now deliberate on the impeachment, potentially leading to months of political uncertainty. The article argues that Park should resign immediately to allow for a new presidential election and restore governmental stability.

The article discusses Donald Trump's proposal to engage in dialogue with North Korea's leader Kim Jong-un, suggesting it could be a positive shift in US foreign policy. It criticizes the current and past US administrations for their ineffective approaches to North Korea, highlighting the need for imaginative diplomacy. The author argues that talking to adversaries is essential for understanding and potentially resolving conflicts, using historical examples to support this view. The article also emphasizes the importance of seizing diplomatic opportunities with North Korea, despite its challenging nature.

North Korea's recent threats, including a nuclear strike on Manhattan, have escalated tensions, prompting strong reactions from the US, South Korea, and even China. The US Congress passed new sanctions, and South Korea shut down the Kaesong industrial complex. Joint military exercises between the US and South Korea have intensified, raising concerns about potential escalation. The article questions whether backing North Korea into a corner is a wise strategy and suggests that a return to diplomacy is inevitable, despite the current icy outlook.

The article criticizes South Korea's decision to close the Kaesong Industrial Complex, labeling it as short-sighted and wrong. It highlights recent provocative actions by North Korea, including a nuclear test and a satellite launch, which are seen as escalations in the ongoing tensions on the Korean Peninsula.

North Korea, officially the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), is notorious for its authoritarian regime under Kim Jong-un, who inherited power from his father Kim Jong-il in 2011. The country has a history of severe economic challenges, exacerbated by the collapse of Soviet aid in the 1990s and subsequent famines. Despite international aid, including significant contributions from the UN World Food Programme, the regime's nuclear ambitions have led to sanctions and further isolation. The DPRK's economy relies heavily on unofficial markets, and while the state no longer suppresses these markets, it does not support them either. Human rights abuses remain rampant, with many citizens covertly consuming South Korean media, revealing a stark contrast between the two Koreas. Despite predictions of collapse, the regime persists, with change likely needing to come from within.

Kim Young-sam, former president of South Korea, has passed away at the age of 87. He was a key figure in the country's struggle for democracy against military dictators from the 1960s to the 80s. Born on Geoje island, he was the youngest member of South Korea's National Assembly at 26 and was re-elected nine times. He opposed dictatorial regimes of Syngman Rhee, Park Chung-hee, and Chun Doo-hwan, enduring hardships such as a hunger strike and force-feeding. Kim's presidency from 1993 to 1998 saw the arrest of former presidents Chun and Roh for extortion, the dissolution of a suspect officers' association, and the country's entry into the OECD. However, his tenure was marred by an economic crisis that led to an IMF bailout. Kim's later years were marked by low public visibility and health issues. He is survived by his wife, Myung-soon, their five children, and five younger sisters.

The article discusses the recent inter-Korean crisis and the ongoing talks between North and South Korea at Panmunjom. It highlights the rapid developments and the challenges of writing timely commentary on such dynamic events.

The article discusses the latest crisis between North and South Korea, highlighting the restrained yet tense military exchanges and the ongoing high-level talks. It criticizes both North Korean leader Kim Jong-un for his unpredictability and South Korean President Park Geun-hye for her hardline stance. The Federation of Korean Industries' proposal for business cooperation is seen as a positive long-term solution. The article warns of the risks of miscalculation and the need for both Koreas to break the cycle of provocations and think long-term.

Kim Jong-un's alleged execution of General Hyon Yong-chol, reported by South Korea's National Intelligence Service, highlights the North Korean leader's ruthless approach to consolidating power. This action, part of a broader pattern of purges and leadership changes since Kim took power in 2011, aims to assert his authority but risks undermining loyalty and stability within the regime. The article draws parallels with historical figures and suggests that Kim's arbitrary cruelty may ultimately weaken his rule.

President Park Geun-hye's ongoing cabinet reshuffle in South Korea involves a series of confirmation hearings before the National Assembly. Despite the grilling by lawmakers, the president retains the authority to appoint her chosen candidates, except for the prime minister, who requires legislative approval. The process is described as a 'bizarre circus' due to the imbalance of power favoring the presidential Blue House.

Lee Myung-bak, South Korea's former president, was known for his active presence and significant projects such as hosting the G-20 and the Four Rivers project during his tenure from 2008 to early 2013.

Cho Hyun-ah, former vice-president of Korean Air, faces severe personal and professional repercussions following the 'Nut Rage' incident. The article suggests that while her actions were undeniably wrong, the extent of her punishment may be excessive.

A Canadian comic creates a satirical film for a Japanese-owned Hollywood studio, targeting a real-life dictator who meets an explosive end. The North Korean regime threatens severe retaliation, but is largely ignored. However, weeks before the film's release, the studio is hacked, leading to the leak of several upcoming films, internal emails, salary details, and other confidential data, causing significant damage.

Yoo Byung-eun, South Korea's most wanted man, is being pursued by authorities for his alleged connection to Chonghaejin Marine, the company responsible for the Sewol ferry disaster that resulted in over 300 deaths. Despite not being formally charged, Yoo and his family have ignored summonses, prompting strong government action to track him down and seize assets. Yoo, who has a complex history involving multiple identities and a religious group, the Evangelical Baptist Church, has been trying to erase his online presence. The article delves into Yoo's past, including his involvement in a mass suicide scandal and his business ventures, highlighting the intertwining of his religious and corporate activities. The government's determination to apprehend Yoo is underscored, with the case raising questions about the intersection of faith, law, and individual responsibility.

North Korea's recent actions, including missile movements and nuclear tests, have heightened tensions with the United States and South Korea. Despite a temporary de-escalation, the situation remains volatile. North Korea's aggressive rhetoric and actions, such as closing the Kaesong Industrial Complex, contrast with its stated desire for economic development. The article explores the motivations behind North Korea's behavior, suggesting it may be a mix of internal power dynamics and external posturing. The international community, including the United Nations, continues to respond with sanctions and diplomatic efforts.

Kim Jong Un, North Korea's leader, is depicted as a dangerous and unpredictable figure with a penchant for luxury and a disregard for international relations. His recent actions, including threats of nuclear strikes and the scrapping of non-aggression pacts, have heightened tensions with South Korea and the US, raising fears of potential conflict. Despite his seemingly playful public persona, the article suggests Kim Jong Un's actions may be more than bluster, reflecting a readiness for battle and a need to assert his authority both domestically and internationally.

Aidan Foster-Carter recounts a humorous incident involving a cockroach in his hotel room during a security conference in Geneva. Despite the initial shock and the potential for outrage given the high cost of the room, he opts for a nonviolent approach to remove the cockroach. The next morning, the cockroach escapes, leaving him with no evidence but a funny story to share. He uses the experience as a metaphor in his conference speech to illustrate the difference between real threats and mere nuisances.

The article critically examines the prevailing notion that China can and will influence North Korea to curb its provocative actions. It argues that China has its own strategic interests in maintaining a relationship with North Korea and is unlikely to act decisively against it. The piece highlights the historical and current dynamics between China, North Korea, and other regional players like South Korea, Japan, and Russia. It suggests that China's support for North Korea is part of a broader strategy to prevent a unified Korea aligned with the United States, and that the international community needs to adjust its expectations and strategies accordingly.

North Korea, under Kim Jong-il's leadership, has historically manipulated foreign aid to support its military arsenal while suffering from man-made famines. Despite receiving substantial aid, Pyongyang's policies have led to stunted growth among its population and a rejection of foreign goods that do not align with its political narrative. The article highlights the absurdity of North Korea's rejection of South Korean aid due to political and aesthetic reasons, despite the desperate need of its people.

South Koreans appear to be more concerned with a fictional monster from a hit movie, 'Guimul', than the real threat posed by North Korea's missile program, as reported by the Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security. The film, which has drawn a record audience, is based on an incident involving the U.S. military and has sparked environmental and anti-American sentiment. Meanwhile, the North Korean threat, including missile bases and a large arsenal aimed at South Korea and Japan, seems to be downplayed by the South Korean public, which holds a more favorable view of North Korea and China compared to the U.S. and Japan.

South Koreans are not showing fear towards North Korea's missile threat, despite a report from the Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security indicating significant missile capabilities aimed at Japan and South Korea. Instead, South Koreans are flocking to cinemas to watch 'Guimul' ('The Host'), a monster movie about a mutant spawned by toxic fluid from an American military base, which has become a massive hit.

Despite rising tensions between the United States and North Korea over the latter's nuclear program, South Korean individuals and groups continue to provide humanitarian aid to North Korea. Kim Soon Kwon, a South Korean crop scientist nicknamed 'Dr. Corn', has been instrumental in breeding disease-resistant corn seeds and has been aiding North Korean farms since 1998. The 'sunshine' policy of South Korea's outgoing president, Kim Dae Jung, has facilitated such efforts. In December, South Korean groups sent $9 million worth of aid to North Korea, including winter clothing, medicines, and materials for a salmon hatchery.

Korea faces renewed tensions with North Korea's nuclear program, but South Korean crop scientist Kim Soon Kwon, known as 'Dr. Corn,' continues his humanitarian work by developing disease-resistant corn for famine-stricken North Korea. Under the 'sunshine' policy of outgoing South Korean President Kim Dae Jung, such cross-border aid is encouraged. In December, various South Korean groups, including the Ministry of Unification, Red Cross, and Korean Sharing Movement, sent significant aid to North Korea, contributing to grassroots efforts to foster healing and cooperation between the two Koreas.

South Korea and Japan, despite their historical rivalry and acrimony stemming from Japan's occupation of Korea, are co-hosting the soccer World Cup. The event has highlighted ongoing tensions, such as disputes over the order of names on tickets and deeper issues like Japan's handling of its wartime past, including the issue of 'comfort women' and revisionist textbooks. The article suggests that both nations have work to do in overcoming the past, with Japan needing to acknowledge its history more fully and Korea reassessing its attitudes towards former colonizers.

South Korean President Kim Dae Jung, once celebrated with a Nobel Peace Prize, now struggles with a low approval rating and is considered a lame duck. Despite initial economic successes and a groundbreaking summit with North Korea, economic growth is faltering, and conglomerates are resisting further reforms. Additionally, his 'sunshine' policy with North Korea faces criticism for lack of reciprocity, and the Bush administration's hardline stance has complicated diplomatic efforts.

Burma remains the only ASEAN member refusing to establish diplomatic relations with North Korea, demanding an admission and apology for the 1983 terrorist attack in Rangoon. Despite North Korea's recent diplomatic efforts, including relations with Italy, Australia, and Kuwait, Burma stands firm on its principles. The article critiques the U.S. for setting a precedent with the Geneva Agreed Framework, which rewarded North Korea despite its illegal nuclear activities. The text underscores the importance of not compromising on principles in international diplomacy.

South Korea is confronting its past with investigations into alleged atrocities during the Korean War, including the No Gun Ri massacre by U.S. troops and the mass execution of political prisoners at Taejon by South Korean military police. President Kim Dae Jung has authorized a probe into the 1948 Cheju uprising. The Associated Press's research on No Gun Ri has prompted a Pentagon inquiry and spurred South Koreans to reflect on their history. Historical accounts and media coverage have previously been censored or ignored, but recent efforts aim to bring these events to light.

South Korea's Hyundai founder Chung Ju Yung's recent visit to North Korea, aimed at fostering business and goodwill, is jeopardized by North Korean provocations, including the capture of a spy submarine and the discovery of a dead frogman. Despite these incidents, South Korean President Kim Dae Jung remains committed to his 'sunshine' policy of engagement with the North. The article underscores the delicate balance in North-South relations and the challenges posed by North Korea's actions.

President Kim Dae Jung of South Korea, despite his age, is embarking on a demanding visit to the United States, where he will deliver 26 speeches in nine days. Kim is celebrated for his moral stature, vision, and political acumen, standing out in a region often associated with negative news. He has consistently championed democracy, surviving multiple assassination attempts, and has shown remarkable forgiveness. Economically, Kim has initiated significant reforms to dismantle the old, corrupt Korea Inc., advocating for free markets, reduced government size, and increased foreign participation.

North Korea's recent threat to resume nuclear activity highlights the importance of the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO), a successful initiative that has defused nuclear tensions and fostered cooperation between North Korea, South Korea, Japan, and the United States. Despite its success, KEDO's future is jeopardized by public disagreements over funding among the involved nations. The Geneva agreement of 1994, which led to the creation of KEDO, has been instrumental in transforming the nuclear issue from a major risk to a hopeful prospect for the Korean Peninsula.